Business leaders might additionally be worried about precedent
Should they could issue a solitary declaration affirming that вЂњBlack lives matter,вЂќ that might be fine. But just what if that declaration generated a need to embrace controversial components of the Black Lives situation agenda? Or then prompted an employee with a son in law enforcement to demand a statement that says вЂњBlue lives matterвЂќ if the murder of a Bay Area police officer? Or if perhaps a member of staff by having a son who has got Down problem asked for a declaration against selective abortion? Or if perhaps a Uighur worker requests a declaration acknowledging AsiaвЂ™s efforts to place Muslims in concentration camps, a statement that upsets a cohort of Chinese workers? Or if a Palestinian worker touched down an interior workplace debate in regards to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? These slippery-slope issues are inherently speculative, but that doesnвЂ™t make sure they are irrational. Management might gamble that theyвЂ™re best off upsetting their staff when with a norm against statements than offending all of them with a specific declaration, or non-statement, in the foreseeable future.